Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 65

Thread: Baseball begins!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    255

    Talking Baseball begins!

    Spring training has begun - so what do people think? How will it turn out? (And, no, we will not be stoning to death those who predict wrong! We are baseball fans, not prophets).

    AL East: Yankees. They have shored up their pitching, and if A-Rod is healthy, they should win easily. Cano at second, Granderson in center. If Jeter can repeat his 2nd half performance of last year, he should have another good season. Sad about losing Posada, and trading Montero was a surprise, but they have a lot of depth behind the plate.

    AL Central: Tigers. The addition of Prince Fielder into the great team they had in 2011. And, being in the AL, he has the chance to DH. Tigers easily.

    AL West: Angels. The addition of Pujols gives them a great edge over the Rangers. Not sure if Texas can get up after last year's loss in the World Series.

    NL East: Phillies. The rest just don't seem strong enough to compete. Of course, Howard has to get healthy.

    NL Central: Hard to say. The Brewers loss of Fielder, and the Cardinals loss of Pujols makes guessing hard. It could, like last year, come down to the wire.

    NL West: My heart wants to say the Dodgers (yes, I know, but I said "heart", not "head"), but IF they can get past their off field problems, and IF the new owner can bring them together - who knows. Too many "if's", so I will go with Arizona. I think that the Giants in 2010 was more "all good things coming together at once", and probably won't happen again. But, if Posey can come back healthy???

    AL Wild Cards: Red Sox (so long as they can get their act together). Last September surprised/shocked us all, even us Yankee fans. They can come back, but they have to get their heads straight. The second Wild Card will be a fight between the Rays and the Rangers. The Rays have the harder division, so I will go with the Rangers.

    NL Wild Cards: Either Cards or Brewers (depending on who doesn't win the division) and Atlanta - providing they don't implode again - see Red Sox, above.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,097

    Default

    I'm more a fan of specific teams than a fan of the sport. In other words, I don't keep track of every possible team/division, so I can't comment quite as thoroughly. I do think you're quite right on AL Central though. I find it hard to see the Tigers not wrapping up the central. All I can do is hope my Twins don't repeat last season's epic loss total. In the NL Central, I find it interesting you didn't even mention the Reds. I think their division is a pretty open one and although I'd like to see the Cards take it, I think just about everyone has a shot.
    Michael Hanel
    PhD candidate Classics Univ. of Cincinnati
    MDiv Concordia Seminary
    MA Classics Washington University
    Unofficial BibleWorks Blog
    LibraryThing!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Hanel View Post
    I find it interesting you didn't even mention the Reds. I think their division is a pretty open one and although I'd like to see the Cards take it, I think just about everyone has a shot.
    I believe that you are right. The loss of Fielder and Pujols - plus other team changes (for instance, the Cards losing LaRussa as manager) makes the NL Central a tough call.

    I had thought about the Reds. These last few years they seem to start well - but then fade out mid-summer. Lack of player depth. Lack of something. This is one of the reasons I did not consider them.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,097

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimofbentley View Post
    I believe that you are right. The loss of Fielder and Pujols - plus other team changes (for instance, the Cards losing LaRussa as manager) makes the NL Central a tough call.

    I had thought about the Reds. These last few years they seem to start well - but then fade out mid-summer. Lack of player depth. Lack of something. This is one of the reasons I did not consider them.
    That is true, they do seem to have a lot of talent that somehow loses steam, but they have some really solid hitters (Joey Votto, Jay Bruce and the addition of Ludwick). Pitching is always their soft spot it seems. And injuries of course.

    The Cards could pick up steam if Wainwright is back in form after his lost year, but that's always an up and down thing. I think if Berkman and Holliday can stay healthy, they'll still have a decent hitting team. No team can lose a guy like Pujols and be the same, but if those two would stay healthy, they have the potential to at least soften the blow.

    I still don't think it's easy to count anyone out of the NL Central, and I won't be surprised (or unhappy) if it takes most of the season to get figured out. I enjoy parity much more than I enjoy dominance.
    Michael Hanel
    PhD candidate Classics Univ. of Cincinnati
    MDiv Concordia Seminary
    MA Classics Washington University
    Unofficial BibleWorks Blog
    LibraryThing!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Hanel View Post
    I still don't think it's easy to count anyone out of the NL Central, and I won't be surprised (or unhappy) if it takes most of the season to get figured out.
    I'm 100% with you on this one.

    Last year's wild card races - going down to the very last day. Fantastic!

    I remember well the 1967 AL race where any of three teams could have won on the last day. Truly exciting stuff.

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Hanel View Post
    I enjoy parity much more than I enjoy dominance.
    So do I. Just so long as the Yankees win it all in the end.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,097

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimofbentley View Post

    So do I. Just so long as the Yankees win it all in the end.

    That's a real good way to end a conversation, sir. I'm glad you didn't start with that

    Fortunately I play fantasy baseball to get out all that angst. I can still cheer for the Yankees as long as they score points for me in one way or the other
    Michael Hanel
    PhD candidate Classics Univ. of Cincinnati
    MDiv Concordia Seminary
    MA Classics Washington University
    Unofficial BibleWorks Blog
    LibraryThing!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    255

    Default

    And now Andy Pettitte has decided to come out of retirement and pitch again for the Yankees?!

    If he comes good (it has been a full year) who knows what could happen.

    If he does, it adds even greater depth to the Yankee pitching staff.



    http://content.usatoday.com/communit...rian-cashman/1

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    286

    Default

    Your predictions sound pretty good. Of course, they say the Yankees should win the AL East (if not the WS) just about every year.

    I wouldn't give the AL West to the Angels just yet. I was worried when they got C.J. Wilson from the Rangers, but Yu Darvish sounds like the real deal.

    By and large, hard to disagree with you.
    καὶ ὑπὲρ πάντων ἀπέθανεν ἵνα οἱ ζῶντες μηκέτι ἑαυτοῖς ζῶσιν, ἀλλὰ τῷ ὑπὲρ αὐτῶν ἀποθανόντι καὶ ἐγερθέντι.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    255

    Default

    Well, how am I doing so far?

    I've got it right on the Tigers, and the Cardinals.

    The Dodgers have surprised me (in a most pleasant way, I might add). I don't even mind the Nationals - another big surprise, and a team that I didn't even consider.

    The Yankees, Angels, and Phillies are a "bit" of a dissapointment.

    I'm 2 for 6, not good - but it has only been two weeks.

    I guess that is why they play 162 games!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimofbentley View Post
    Well, how am I doing so far?

    I've got it right on the Tigers, and the Cardinals.

    The Dodgers have surprised me (in a most pleasant way, I might add). I don't even mind the Nationals - another big surprise, and a team that I didn't even consider.

    The Yankees, Angels, and Phillies are a "bit" of a dissapointment.

    I'm 2 for 6, not good - but it has only been two weeks.

    I guess that is why they play 162 games!

    *Ahem* You might note that the Rangers appear to be the class of the AL at this early point. They beat the Red Sox 18-3 last night to go to 9-2 on the season.
    καὶ ὑπὲρ πάντων ἀπέθανεν ἵνα οἱ ζῶντες μηκέτι ἑαυτοῖς ζῶσιν, ἀλλὰ τῷ ὑπὲρ αὐτῶν ἀποθανόντι καὶ ἐγερθέντι.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •