Biblia Sacra Vulgatæ editionis, Sixti V Pontificis Maximi - 1590 editionis

[pasquale]

Biblia sacra vulgatae editionis ad concilii Tridentini praescriptum emendata et a Sixto V. P. M. recognita et approbata

Romae 1590
NOVUM TESTAMENTUM
from Biblia Sacra, Vulgatæ Editionis, Sixti V et Clementis VIII, 1590, 1592, 1593, 1598, Leander van Ess Editore (1822-1824)
Possible copyright status: NOT IN COPYRIGHT
formatted by Pasquale Amicarelli

[Michael Hanel]

Mark Eddy provided a better vmf file.

Here is the link to last update (29-05-2009)


Michael, please post it on BibleWorks blog!

thanks again

The 5/29 update of the files is located here, but a blog post is pending (1 1/2 more weeks of the academic term).

[pasquale]

Biblia Sacra Vulgatae editionis ad concilii Tridentini praescriptum emendata et a Sixto V. P. M. recognita et approbata

Romae 1590

VETERUM ET NOVUM TESTAMENTUM
————————

The base text is: Textum Clementinum ex editione anni 1592

from http://bibbia.signum.sns.it/p_TOC15920000Vulgata15920000Vulgata.php
————————

Collationem Editionis Sixtinae anni 1590

from Biblia Sacra, Vulgatæ Editionis, Sixti V et Clementis VIII, 1590, 1592, 1593, 1598, Leander van Ess Editore (1822-1824)

http://www.sacredbible.org/vulgate1822/index.htm
————————

Only to compare doubtuful readings:

Novum Testamentum Latine — Textum Vaticanum cum apparatu critico ex editionibus et libris manu scriptis collecto imprimendum curavit EBERHARD NESTLE — editio decima — 1967

Nouum Testamentum Latine secundum editionem Sanctii Hieronymi ad codicum manuscriptorum fidem recensuerunt IOHANNES WORDSWORTH et HENRICUS IULIANUS WHITE — editio minor 1911

————————

compiled in BibleWorks by Pasquale Amicarelli

————————

Notes
In the text: ae pro æ — Ae pro Æ — oe pro œ — e pro ë

Link: (corrected file, release 10/22/2009)
http://www.mediafire.com/file/tvmmlr3byem/vusVTNT.zip

PS
The base text isn't Tweedale Clementine Vulgate

[Michael Hanel]

1. Thanks for the reminder that I still never got that blog post done.

2. What is the main difference between this release vs. the 5/29 one?

[pasquale]

1. Thanks for the reminder that I still never got that blog post done.

No problem!!!

2. What is the main difference between this release vs. the 5/29 one?

1) This release include the full Bible: Old and New Testament;

2) 5/29 release have The Tweedale Clementine Vulgate as "base text", and only van Ess's "collationes sixtine"
10/21 release have as base text the "original" "Clementine Vulgate 1592" (included the punctuation and orthography).
Furthermore I have compared the New Testament's "collationes sixtine" from Nestle and Wordsworth works.

Tweedale Clementine Vulgate is a vulgate text, based on 1592, 1593, 1598, and Correctoria Romana, as Hetzenauer "1914", Vercellone "1861" and Colunga-Turrado "1946" Vulgate (it isn't a good base text for Sixtine 1590 vulgate).

[Mark Eddy]

The difference is that this latest edition of VUS contains the Old Testament as well as the New Testament.
There is a compiling error. 2Co 1:24 is listed as part of 2Co 1:23. It needs to be made a separate line in Pasquale's vus.txt file and then be recompiled.
Separately I'm sending Pasquale a corrected vus.vmf file which should be replace that file in Pasquale's upload.
Mark Eddy

[pasquale]

Thanks Mark

Here is the last corrected file (release 10/22/2009):
http://www.mediafire.com/file/tvmmlr3byem/vusVTNT.zip

pasquale