Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Biblia Sacra Vulgatę editionis, Sixti V Pontificis Maximi - 1590 editionis

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Biblia sacra vulgatae editionis ad concilii Tridentini praescriptum emendata et a Sixto V. P. M. recognita et approbata
    Romae 1590
    NOVUM TESTAMENTUM
    from Biblia Sacra, Vulgatę Editionis, Sixti V et Clementis VIII, 1590, 1592, 1593, 1598, Leander van Ess Editore (1822-1824)
    Possible copyright status: NOT IN COPYRIGHT
    formatted by Pasquale Amicarelli
    Last edited by pasquale; 07-27-2009 at 04:19 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pasquale View Post
    Mark Eddy provided a better vmf file.

    Here is the link to last update (29-05-2009)


    Michael, please post it on BibleWorks blog!

    thanks again
    The 5/29 update of the files is located here, but a blog post is pending (1 1/2 more weeks of the academic term).
    Michael Hanel
    PhD candidate Classics Univ. of Cincinnati
    MDiv Concordia Seminary
    MA Classics Washington University
    Unofficial BibleWorks Blog
    LibraryThing!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    122

    Default Biblia Sacra Vulgatae editionis - VT and NT (NT new edition)

    Biblia Sacra Vulgatae editionis ad concilii Tridentini praescriptum emendata et a Sixto V. P. M. recognita et approbata

    Romae 1590

    VETERUM ET NOVUM TESTAMENTUM
    ————————

    The base text is: Textum Clementinum ex editione anni 1592


    Collationem Editionis Sixtinae anni 1590

    from Biblia Sacra, Vulgatę Editionis, Sixti V et Clementis VIII, 1590, 1592, 1593, 1598, Leander van Ess Editore (1822-1824)



    Only to compare doubtuful readings:

    Novum Testamentum Latine — Textum Vaticanum cum apparatu critico ex editionibus et libris manu scriptis collecto imprimendum curavit EBERHARD NESTLE — editio decima — 1967
    Nouum Testamentum Latine secundum editionem Sanctii Hieronymi ad codicum manuscriptorum fidem recensuerunt IOHANNES WORDSWORTH et HENRICUS IULIANUS WHITE — editio minor 1911
    ————————

    compiled in BibleWorks by Pasquale Amicarelli

    ————————
    Notes
    In the text: ae pro ę Ae pro Ę oe pro œ e pro ė

    Link: (corrected file, release 10/22/2009)
    http://www.mediafire.com/file/tvmmlr3byem/vusVTNT.zip

    PS
    The base text isn't Tweedale Clementine Vulgate
    Last edited by pasquale; 10-22-2009 at 12:48 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    2,099

    Default

    1. Thanks for the reminder that I still never got that blog post done.

    2. What is the main difference between this release vs. the 5/29 one?
    Michael Hanel
    PhD candidate Classics Univ. of Cincinnati
    MDiv Concordia Seminary
    MA Classics Washington University
    Unofficial BibleWorks Blog
    LibraryThing!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Hanel View Post
    1. Thanks for the reminder that I still never got that blog post done.
    No problem!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Hanel View Post
    2. What is the main difference between this release vs. the 5/29 one?
    1) This release include the full Bible: Old and New Testament;

    2) 5/29 release have The Tweedale Clementine Vulgate as "base text", and only van Ess's "collationes sixtine"
    10/21 release have as base text the "original" "Clementine Vulgate 1592" (included the punctuation and orthography).
    Furthermore I have compared the New Testament's "collationes sixtine" from Nestle and Wordsworth works.

    Tweedale Clementine Vulgate is a vulgate text, based on 1592, 1593, 1598, and Correctoria Romana, as Hetzenauer "1914", Vercellone "1861" and Colunga-Turrado "1946" Vulgate (it isn't a good base text for Sixtine 1590 vulgate).
    Last edited by pasquale; 12-05-2009 at 12:48 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    916

    Default

    The difference is that this latest edition of VUS contains the Old Testament as well as the New Testament.
    There is a compiling error. 2Co 1:24 is listed as part of 2Co 1:23. It needs to be made a separate line in Pasquale's vus.txt file and then be recompiled.
    Separately I'm sending Pasquale a corrected vus.vmf file which should be replace that file in Pasquale's upload.
    Mark Eddy

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    122

    Default Corrected 2Co 1:24 and new vmf file

    Thanks Mark

    Here is the last corrected file (release 10/22/2009):
    http://www.mediafire.com/file/tvmmlr3byem/vusVTNT.zip

    pasquale

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •