Parsing error in Mk 12:42?

[ingosorke]

In Mk 12:42 GNT ch,ra (widow) is parsed as adjective pronoun; should it not be a noun?

All Lemma occurrences of ch,ra are parsed as adjective. Is the complement gunh, assumed?

I recognize the adjectival background (as in Thayer: feminine of the adjective ch/roj ), but even the UBS Dictionary lists ch,ra as a fem. noun.

[Adelphos]

In Mk 12:42 GNT ch,ra (widow) is parsed as adjective pronoun; should it not be a noun?

Notice in the SCR it's tagged as a noun, which, functionally, it is.

In the printed edition of Friberg, Analytical Greek New Testament, it is tagged as an adjective pronoun, so the GNT is not a misprint.